![]() The Volt was never going to be a crossover under any stretch of the imagination. The Volt, however, was the opposite of the upright Bolt EV hatchback, which GM has laughably attempted to market as a “crossover.” The plug-in hybrid was low and sleek, and its bulky T-shaped battery compromised interior room. What is clear, though, is that over the Volt’s nine years, consumer preferences turned decisively away from the passenger-car segment (sedans and hatchbacks) and toward crossover utilities of every size and shape-including a few that are only front-wheel-drive hatchbacks in disguise. Would the Volt have done better if the second-generation 2016 version had been a small crossover utility vehicle? We’ll never know.ĭespite rumors that the second-generation Volt would be replaced by a crossover, it’s entirely unclear if the Voltec powertrain (nee E-Flex) will live on anywhere in the GM lineup. ![]() In 2011, that chorus was much louder-and GM wanted recognition for its EV expertise, and perhaps absolution for what were perceived to be its sins. Lindland, founder of, also notes, “Toyota buyers are very different than Chevy buyers.”įinally, for electric-car fans, GM was the company that destroyed the EV1 fleet, as chronicled in “Who Killed the Electric Car?” Even today, this site occasionally hears from people who claim they will never buy a GM car because of that action (despite the subsequent Bolt EV and Volt). While Prius owners did that too, Toyota soon expanded its hybrid technology across its model lineup, washing the whole brand with the Prius halo for those who wanted it. That was GM’s first and very, very critical error.” Innovators and early adopters are financially secure and risk-oriented: They want luxury, and will put up with inconveniences to be seen in the first of something. “It’s critical to understand the technology adoption curve, and the people who live there. The problem, suggests auto analyst Rebecca Lindland, was that “Chevrolet is not an aspirational brand for innovators and early adopters.” Often you’d hear owners saying they drove a “Volt,” entirely ignoring the Chevrolet part. ![]() The first Bolt EV was delivered in December 2016.Īll of a sudden, the Volt plug-in hybrid had sibling rivalry: a car priced about the same, but a “pure” electric vehicle with usable range.Ĭhevrolet Bolt EV electric car and Chevrolet Volt plug-in hybrid The answer was almost surely yes, because in January 2015, the Chevy Bolt concept was announced, with 200 miles of range and a price of just $37,500. GM convened a task force to ascertain whether Tesla posed a competitive threat. When the first Volt was sold in December 2010, Tesla was struggling to recover from production delays for its Roadster, including a two-speed gearbox that had to be replaced entirely, plus the general effects of the economic recession.īy 2013, however, it was clear that the Tesla Model S-however slowly it entered production-was an entirely different kettle of fish. The sound system is also very good and very configurable.The Chevrolet Volt concept was revealed at the Detroit auto show in January 2007, only a few months after a crazy California startup called Tesla announced it would build battery-electric cars with 200 miles of range or more. I drives quietly and quite smoothly in both acceleration and deceleration, even in one-pedal driving, making it a real pleasure to get around in. This can be mitigated by purchasing a cheap compatible tire for a 2011-2014 Chevy Cruze which will fit the vehicle just so one can make it to a repair shop. I should mention that if the vehicle is purchased used it may not come with the stock self-healing tires and that is somewhat of a concern as GM does not, by reason of the battery location, provide the vehicle with any spare at all. The car keeps you well informed of its driving efficiency via evaluation info panels thereby helping the driver to drive better overall. Love the technology, which there's plenty of. The seats in the back are well cushioned oddly enough and comfortable. ![]() Nevertheless with minor and rather cheap investments the seats can be cushioned to better support the driver and passenger. The only drawback, and it's minor in comparison, is the seats upfront which I find a bit rigid. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |